Black Lives & Native Lands: Rewriting the History of New England
David Guzman May 5, 2020, Black Perspectives
The study of slavery in New England has experienced something of a
revival in the last decade. Given that New England is often treated as a
hub of liberty after the American Revolution, colonial America
scholar Jared Ross Hardesty joins a number of historians
in dissociating the region from the parochialism and exceptionalism
given to it in earlier studies. In his book, **Black Lives, Native
Lands, White Worlds: A History of Slavery in New England, Hardesty
convincingly argues that New England should be a part
of a wider story of slavery and colonization in the Americas. Meant as a
synthetic history, Hardesty treads the same path as Lorenzo Johnston
Greene did in his 1942 work,
The Negro in Colonial New England, 1620-1776. Updated with the
latest scholarship on the subject, Hardesty’s work offers a brief and
concise history of slavery in New England.
Utilizing a settler-colonial framework of analysis for much of his work,
Hardesty organizes his chapters chronologically and thematically, first
outlining the origins of sixteenth-century England’s involvement
in slavery and ending with the problems associated
with emancipation in New England. Weaved throughout his narrative are
the themes of oppression, exploitation, enslavement, resistance,
and assertions of humanity. Drawing from newspapers, account books,
letters, autobiographies, and legal documents, Hardesty’s inclusion
of enslaved peoples’ lives greatly enriches and humanizes the narrative
crafted from his rich source of secondary literature. It also reflects
his keen ability to construct the lives, experiences, and pasts
of enslaved men and women even among a scarcity of
documentary evidence.
continue
think
absolute power depends on absolute control over knowledge, which in turn necessitates absolute corruption
Popular posts from this blog
The truth about Jackson’s savagery was just as disturbing as the fake news. After a particularly bloody battle in 1814, Andrew Jackson’s men counted the dead Indians by cutting off their noses. They collected 557 noses.
and... (this comment)
Jackson ran an ad in the Nashville Gazette, in October, 1804, for the capture of a runaway slave, which stated that in addition to the reward, he would pay an extra $10 per 100 lashes (up to 300), to anyone who willing to inflict them upon his miscreant property. He was known to hold a vengeful lifetime grudge against anyone whom he felt had slighted him, regardless of how minor the supposed offense. His betrayal the Choctow tribe, whom he persuaded to become American allies over the British during the war of 1812, culminated in the “Indian Removal Act” (Trail of Tears), of which he took personal responsiblity to see implemented, resulted in the death of thousands of men, women and children. It’s no surprise that the current occupant of the White…
'There
were Africans in Britain before the English came here': how Staying Power shook British history
“The very serious function of
racism is distraction,” Toni Morrison argued in a lecture in Portland, Oregon, in 1975:
It keeps you from doing your work. It keeps you explaining, over and
over again, your reason for being. Somebody says you have no language
and you spend twenty years proving that you do. Somebody says your head
isn’t shaped properly so you have scientists working
on the fact that it is. Somebody says you have no art, so you dredge
that up. Somebody says you have no kingdoms, so you dredge that up. None
of this is necessary. There will always be one more thing.
For the longest time the central distraction for black Britons
was insisting on our existence. That we were black was unarguable. That
we were in Britain was acknowledged if only to be contested. But the
notion that we could be black and British, both from
this place and in our bodies, confoun…
Comments