The Last Lynching Victim in South Carolina
The
Last Lynching Victim in South Carolina
Brent M. S. Campney reviews William B. Gravely’s They Stole Him Out of Jail: Willie Earle, South Carolina’s Last Lynching Victim.
October 31, 2019, Black Perspectives
In They Stole Him Out of Jail: Willie Earle, South Carolina’s Last Lynching Victim,
William B. Gravely, professor emeritus at the University of Denver,
explores the 1947 lynching of Willie Earle in South Carolina, the
criminal investigations and trials
that followed, and the memory and legacy of those events. The
product of some forty years of research, the book builds upon an
impressive evidentiary base, including newspaper coverage by the Black
and white presses, interviews with participants and witnesses,
and letters and a notebook regarding the trial proceedings written by
the British novelist Rebecca West, who was in attendance. Unfortunately,
he notes, “no library, private holdings, attorney files, court records,
or archive has a transcript of the trial”
(168). Although a second-grader in Pickens County at the time of the
lynching, Gravely first learned of the case during a 1978 conversation
and soon turned his attention toward researching the incident. Given his
insider status, Gravely gained access to many
of the central players in the incident: “My first foray yielded
contacts with the jailer’s daughter, Willie Earle’s mother, two defense
attorneys from the trial, two journalists … , the prosecutor, a law
associate of the special state prosecutor, and two Black civil
rights activists affected by the lynching,” he writes (xvi-xvii).
In February 1947, an unknown Black assailant robbed and murdered a
middle-aged white taxicab driver and World War I veteran, Thomas Watson
Brown, on the outskirts of Pickens in a crime that outraged
white townspeople. Following the arrest of Willie Earle, who
denied any involvement, a mob of cabbies, determined to avenge the
death of their colleague, seized Earle from the jail, drove him to a
secluded spot outside of Pickens, and executed him in an orgy of
stabbing and shooting. In the immediate aftermath, local and
state authorities, including Governor Strom Thurmond, denounced the
violence as an assault on law and order. For the most part, their
opposition to the lynching was predicated on a desire to protect the
reputation of their state and to forestall federal intervention
into their affairs. After a “whirlwind-like dragnet” in the days after
the killing, officials rounded up thirty-one white men suspected in the
crime (xiii).
continue
think
absolute power depends on absolute control over knowledge, which in turn necessitates absolute corruption
Popular posts from this blog
The truth about Jackson’s savagery was just as disturbing as the fake news. After a particularly bloody battle in 1814, Andrew Jackson’s men counted the dead Indians by cutting off their noses. They collected 557 noses.
and... (this comment)
Jackson ran an ad in the Nashville Gazette, in October, 1804, for the capture of a runaway slave, which stated that in addition to the reward, he would pay an extra $10 per 100 lashes (up to 300), to anyone who willing to inflict them upon his miscreant property. He was known to hold a vengeful lifetime grudge against anyone whom he felt had slighted him, regardless of how minor the supposed offense. His betrayal the Choctow tribe, whom he persuaded to become American allies over the British during the war of 1812, culminated in the “Indian Removal Act” (Trail of Tears), of which he took personal responsiblity to see implemented, resulted in the death of thousands of men, women and children. It’s no surprise that the current occupant of the White…
They
were once America’s cruelest, richest slave traders. Why does no one know their names?
Hannah Natanson, September 14, 2019,
The Washington Post
The two most ruthless domestic slave traders in America had a secret language for their business.
Slave trading was a “game.” The men, Isaac Franklin and John
Armfield, were daring “pirates” or “one-eyed men,” a euphemism for their
penises. The women they bought and sold were “fancy maids,” a term
signifying youth, beauty and potential for sexual exploitation
— by buyers or the traders themselves.
Rapes happened often.
“To my certain knowledge she has been used & that smartly by a
one eyed man about my size and age, excuse my foolishness,”
Isaac Franklin’s nephew James — an employee and his uncle’s protege
— wrote in typical business correspondence, referring to Caroline
Brown, an enslaved woman who suffered repeated rape and abuse at
James’s hands for five months. She was 18 at the time and just over five
feet tall.
continu…
Wikimedia Commons “Slaves working in 17th-century Virginia,” by an unknown artist, 1670. by
Vincent Schilling Sep 12, 2017 1619, the year slavery was born, or was it?
The Joseph Jenkins Roberts Center at Norfolk State University (NSU) held a conference called
1619: The Making of America
in September of 2013. That year is historically significant because it
was the first year Africans were brought to the colonies, slavery was
born and it was the year America’s first legislative body was founded.
In
an admirable gesture to honor all of the cultural relations happening
in the America’s in 1619, NSU hosted several Native speakers and those
familiar with Native history to address many issues not often covered in
today’s classrooms. During these sessions, many little known facts
about African Americans, Native Americans and slavery were addressed in
the years following 1619.
The Term Negro May Have Been Meant For American Indians
During the session
Native Americans at 1619
Dr. Arica Co…
Comments