The Black radical tradition of hope
I
am constantly asking myself these questions: Why does the
decolonization of museums matter? Why do I continue to visit these
colonized spaces knowing they rest comfortably in their resistance to
change? I see museums as liminal spaces. The word “liminal”
comes from the Latin root, limen, which means “threshold.” The liminal
space is the “crossing over” where you have left something behind, yet
you are not yet fully in something else. When museums operate in their
full liminal potential they are able to tell non-binary histories. For
US museums this means acknowledging colonialism, imperialism and white
supremacy while also striving towards a decolonialized future.
While
I’m not certain all institutions have this potential, I believe art and
cultural institutions do because many of their mission statements
already lean in this direction—but too often they do not have the
internal institutional courage to move from polite social justice talk
to radical decolonized action. This is why it is critical that the
public continue to apply pressure to power, so institutional leaders do
not become complacent or complicit. I stand in the Black radical
tradition of hope. I believe it is possible for art institutions to
serve as a zone between the “what was” and “ the next.”
What was, is a dark history of colonization and human exploitation.
The next, is a decolonized world. It is coming whether the keepers of colonization want it or not.
think
absolute power depends on absolute control over knowledge, which in turn necessitates absolute corruption
Popular posts from this blog
Elles Houwelingon, January 21, 2019, New Historian
Everyone has heard shocking stories about the transatlantic slave trade,
but this was hardly the only type of slavery in which Europeans were
engaged. The Pacific slave trade involved the forceful enslavement of
Pacific islanders from the mid 19thcentury to
the 20thcentury. This particular type of slavery is often referred to
as “blackbirding”.
The primary focus of “blackbirding” was to supply cheap labor to
sugar-cane plantations on Pacific plantations, particularly in
Queensland, Fiji, New Caledonia, and the Samoan Islands. This was mainly
achieved through trickery and kidnapping. They were frequently
deceived about the length of time for which they were “contracted” and
the nature of their “contract”. If all this failed, the islanders were
simply loaded onto slave ships at gunpoint.
The captured islanders were collectively known as Kanakas, which means
Person or Man in Hawaiian. These workers were essentially treated a…
The truth about Jackson’s savagery was just as disturbing as the fake news. After a particularly bloody battle in 1814, Andrew Jackson’s men counted the dead Indians by cutting off their noses. They collected 557 noses.
and... (this comment)
Jackson ran an ad in the Nashville Gazette, in October, 1804, for the capture of a runaway slave, which stated that in addition to the reward, he would pay an extra $10 per 100 lashes (up to 300), to anyone who willing to inflict them upon his miscreant property. He was known to hold a vengeful lifetime grudge against anyone whom he felt had slighted him, regardless of how minor the supposed offense. His betrayal the Choctow tribe, whom he persuaded to become American allies over the British during the war of 1812, culminated in the “Indian Removal Act” (Trail of Tears), of which he took personal responsiblity to see implemented, resulted in the death of thousands of men, women and children. It’s no surprise that the current occupant of the White…
Comments