Classism: the big invisible ism

One
of the university’s aims—if increasingly crowded out by others—is the
discovery and dissemination of knowledge. If this alone were the goal,
admissions might be based solely on academic promise, which grades and
test scores reflect in a limited and imperfect way. But this is not the
only mission. To many, universities today are “supposed to be the
engines of social mobility and the gateways to dreams,” as New York
Times columnist Frank Bruni colorfully puts it. This suggests
universities should consider who would benefit most from admission. More
prosaically, many universities manage several semiprofessional sports
teams, for which they must recruit, necessitating a preference for
athletes. And prestigious universities, in particular, have historically
been finishing schools for the hereditary elite, a role that introduces
criteria that favor the wealthy and powerful. This last role is
distasteful to many, but it is hard to deny that it figures in elite
admissions decision-making.
These roles can be complementary, but
they are often in tension. The elite status that powers the “engine” of
social mobility for the select few is in part a consequence of academic
excellence. But it is also, in larger part, the result of networking
with privileged young people who already enjoy the benefits of wealth
and family connections. The effect of this preprofessional social
networking—the chance to rub shoulders with and learn the habits,
customs, and social mores of people whose success is guaranteed by their
inheritance and their parentage—is powerful.
Think so?
absolute power depends on absolute control over knowledge, which in turn necessitates absolute corruption
Think about this
“Politicians, Priests, and psychiatrists often face the same problem: how to find the most rapid and permanent means of changing a man’s belief…The problem of the doctor and his nervously ill patient, and that of the religious leader who sets out to gain and hold new converts, has now become the problem of whole groups of nations, who wish not only to confirm certain political beliefs within their boundaries, but to proselytize the outside world.”
– William Sargant “Battle of the Mind”
Popular posts from this blog
The truth about Jackson’s savagery was just as disturbing as the fake news. After a particularly bloody battle in 1814, Andrew Jackson’s men counted the dead Indians by cutting off their noses. They collected 557 noses. and... (this comment) Jackson ran an ad in the Nashville Gazette, in October, 1804, for the capture of a runaway slave, which stated that in addition to the reward, he would pay an extra $10 per 100 lashes (up to 300), to anyone who willing to inflict them upon his miscreant property. He was known to hold a vengeful lifetime grudge against anyone whom he felt had slighted him, regardless of how minor the supposed offense. His betrayal the Choctow tribe, whom he persuaded to become American allies over the British during the war of 1812, culminated in the “Indian Removal Act” (Trail of Tears), of which he took personal responsiblity to see implemented, resulted in the death of thousands of men, women and children. It’s no surprise that the current occupant of the Wh
Connecticut schools will be required to offer African American, Latino studies under bill that cleared Senate Thursday Daniela Altimari, May 30, 2019, The Hartford Courant African American and Latino studies will be a required part of the public school curriculum in Connecticut by 2022 under a bill unanimously approved by the Senate Thursday night. The measure, which cleared the House of Representatives earlier this month, now heads to Gov. Ned Lamont for consideration. In an emotional speech on the Senate floor, Sen. Douglas McCrory, a Democrat from Hartford spoke of the need for a more inclusive history curriculum. He invoked Nipsey Hussle, the California rapper and community activist who was shot to death in March, and recited a few lyrics from Jay Z’s “Legacy.'' Too often, McCrory said, schools highlight the legacies of Martin Luther King Jr. and Frederick Douglas, but ignore the achievements of lesser-known figures such as Ida B. Wells, an investigat
Press "Sam Pollard’s sobering and essential documentary recounts the government’s efforts to blackmail, discredit, and otherwise disempower Martin Luther King, Jr. during the height of the Civil Rights movement..." —INDIEWIRE "This film seems like one of the most urgent titles on the festival beat this year." —VANITY FAIR "Sam Pollard is back with a new documentary, and it may be the best of this year’s very impressive slate." —ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY "Pollard's 'MLK/FBI' is more than an eye-opening look at an icon...it’s a critical chapter that should be imprinted inside every white American’s heart." —THE PLAYLIST "Director Sam Pollard's illuminating and infuriating documentary focuses on how dirty tricks were used to undermine the work and influence of civil-rights leader Martin Luther King Jr." —USA TODAY
Comments