Enslaved People Never Caught Up
What
Southern dynasties’ post-Civil War resurgence tell us about how wealth is really handed down
Andrew Van Dam, April 4, 2019, The Washington Post
Emancipation should have laid waste to the Southern aristocracy.
The economy was built on the forced labor of enslaved Africans, and
almost half the Confederacy’s wealth was invested in owning humans.
Once people could no longer be treated as chattel, that
wealth evaporated.
But less than two decades after the Civil War, Southern
slave-owning dynasties were back on top of the economic ladder,
according to an ambitious new analysis from Leah Boustan of Princeton
University, Katherine Eriksson of the University of California at Davis
and Philipp Ager of the University of Southern Denmark.
Their research upends the conventional wisdom that slave
owners struggled after they lost access to their wealth. Yes, some fell
behind economically in the war’s aftermath. But by 1880, the sons of
slave owners were better off than the sons of nearby Southern
whites who started with equal wealth but were not as invested in
enslaved people.
The sons of formerly enslaved people never caught up, of course. By 1880
more than 90 percent of them were still in the South, and most
still worked as farm laborers, tenant farmers or sharecroppers. In the
120 years that followed, they consistently saw lower
pay and less upward mobility than similar white men, according to
a separate 2017 working paper by economists Marianne Wanamaker of the
University of Tennessee and William Collins of Vanderbilt University.
continue
think
absolute power depends on absolute control over knowledge, which in turn necessitates absolute corruption
Popular posts from this blog
The truth about Jackson’s savagery was just as disturbing as the fake news. After a particularly bloody battle in 1814, Andrew Jackson’s men counted the dead Indians by cutting off their noses. They collected 557 noses.
and... (this comment)
Jackson ran an ad in the Nashville Gazette, in October, 1804, for the capture of a runaway slave, which stated that in addition to the reward, he would pay an extra $10 per 100 lashes (up to 300), to anyone who willing to inflict them upon his miscreant property. He was known to hold a vengeful lifetime grudge against anyone whom he felt had slighted him, regardless of how minor the supposed offense. His betrayal the Choctow tribe, whom he persuaded to become American allies over the British during the war of 1812, culminated in the “Indian Removal Act” (Trail of Tears), of which he took personal responsiblity to see implemented, resulted in the death of thousands of men, women and children. It’s no surprise that the current occupant of the White…
They
were once America’s cruelest, richest slave traders. Why does no one know their names?
Hannah Natanson, September 14, 2019,
The Washington Post
The two most ruthless domestic slave traders in America had a secret language for their business.
Slave trading was a “game.” The men, Isaac Franklin and John
Armfield, were daring “pirates” or “one-eyed men,” a euphemism for their
penises. The women they bought and sold were “fancy maids,” a term
signifying youth, beauty and potential for sexual exploitation
— by buyers or the traders themselves.
Rapes happened often.
“To my certain knowledge she has been used & that smartly by a
one eyed man about my size and age, excuse my foolishness,”
Isaac Franklin’s nephew James — an employee and his uncle’s protege
— wrote in typical business correspondence, referring to Caroline
Brown, an enslaved woman who suffered repeated rape and abuse at
James’s hands for five months. She was 18 at the time and just over five
feet tall.
continu…
Wikimedia Commons “Slaves working in 17th-century Virginia,” by an unknown artist, 1670. by
Vincent Schilling Sep 12, 2017 1619, the year slavery was born, or was it?
The Joseph Jenkins Roberts Center at Norfolk State University (NSU) held a conference called
1619: The Making of America
in September of 2013. That year is historically significant because it
was the first year Africans were brought to the colonies, slavery was
born and it was the year America’s first legislative body was founded.
In
an admirable gesture to honor all of the cultural relations happening
in the America’s in 1619, NSU hosted several Native speakers and those
familiar with Native history to address many issues not often covered in
today’s classrooms. During these sessions, many little known facts
about African Americans, Native Americans and slavery were addressed in
the years following 1619.
The Term Negro May Have Been Meant For American Indians
During the session
Native Americans at 1619
Dr. Arica Co…
Comments