Racism is Distraction
'There
were Africans in Britain before the English came here': how Staying Power shook British history
“The very serious function of racism is distraction,” Toni Morrison argued in a lecture in Portland, Oregon, in 1975:
It keeps you from doing your work. It keeps you explaining, over and
over again, your reason for being. Somebody says you have no language
and you spend twenty years proving that you do. Somebody says your head
isn’t shaped properly so you have scientists working
on the fact that it is. Somebody says you have no art, so you dredge
that up. Somebody says you have no kingdoms, so you dredge that up. None
of this is necessary. There will always be one more thing.
For the longest time the central distraction for black Britons
was insisting on our existence. That we were black was unarguable. That
we were in Britain was acknowledged if only to be contested. But the
notion that we could be black and British, both from
this place and in our bodies, confounded many, if not most.
Britain, we were told, was an essentially white place in which we had
only just arrived. We had no history here. The colonial connections that
explained our existence were at best opaque and at worst unknown to
most, even as they were mythologised in the very
statues and monuments that surrounded us. Our past did not come up in
curricula or mediated conversation. To the uninformed, ill-informed and
misinformed, which included those who charged themselves with curating
the national narrative, we came from nowhere
and for no good reason.
This had an impact on both our politics and our self-perception. “The
belief that we have come from somewhere,” wrote historian EH Carr, “is
closely linked with the belief that we are going somewhere … our view of
history rejects our view of society.”
Effectively orphaned by the most accessible and partial national story
available, many black Britons sought surrogate historical parents
elsewhere and found them in America, whose story of racial
disenfranchisement and resistance we adopted as our own.
continue…
think
absolute power depends on absolute control over knowledge, which in turn necessitates absolute corruption
Popular posts from this blog
The truth about Jackson’s savagery was just as disturbing as the fake news. After a particularly bloody battle in 1814, Andrew Jackson’s men counted the dead Indians by cutting off their noses. They collected 557 noses.
and... (this comment)
Jackson ran an ad in the Nashville Gazette, in October, 1804, for the capture of a runaway slave, which stated that in addition to the reward, he would pay an extra $10 per 100 lashes (up to 300), to anyone who willing to inflict them upon his miscreant property. He was known to hold a vengeful lifetime grudge against anyone whom he felt had slighted him, regardless of how minor the supposed offense. His betrayal the Choctow tribe, whom he persuaded to become American allies over the British during the war of 1812, culminated in the “Indian Removal Act” (Trail of Tears), of which he took personal responsiblity to see implemented, resulted in the death of thousands of men, women and children. It’s no surprise that the current occupant of the White…
They
were once America’s cruelest, richest slave traders. Why does no one know their names?
Hannah Natanson, September 14, 2019,
The Washington Post
The two most ruthless domestic slave traders in America had a secret language for their business.
Slave trading was a “game.” The men, Isaac Franklin and John
Armfield, were daring “pirates” or “one-eyed men,” a euphemism for their
penises. The women they bought and sold were “fancy maids,” a term
signifying youth, beauty and potential for sexual exploitation
— by buyers or the traders themselves.
Rapes happened often.
“To my certain knowledge she has been used & that smartly by a
one eyed man about my size and age, excuse my foolishness,”
Isaac Franklin’s nephew James — an employee and his uncle’s protege
— wrote in typical business correspondence, referring to Caroline
Brown, an enslaved woman who suffered repeated rape and abuse at
James’s hands for five months. She was 18 at the time and just over five
feet tall.
continu…
Wikimedia Commons “Slaves working in 17th-century Virginia,” by an unknown artist, 1670. by
Vincent Schilling Sep 12, 2017 1619, the year slavery was born, or was it?
The Joseph Jenkins Roberts Center at Norfolk State University (NSU) held a conference called
1619: The Making of America
in September of 2013. That year is historically significant because it
was the first year Africans were brought to the colonies, slavery was
born and it was the year America’s first legislative body was founded.
In
an admirable gesture to honor all of the cultural relations happening
in the America’s in 1619, NSU hosted several Native speakers and those
familiar with Native history to address many issues not often covered in
today’s classrooms. During these sessions, many little known facts
about African Americans, Native Americans and slavery were addressed in
the years following 1619.
The Term Negro May Have Been Meant For American Indians
During the session
Native Americans at 1619
Dr. Arica Co…
Comments